§01 — C-02 · STUDY

Aegean Cliff Retreat

A boutique retreat carried down a cliff — white mineral volumes stepped into stone, each room holding one framed view of the sea.

37.4426° N · 25.3752° E · Aegean Sea

Note — self-initiated studyA self-initiated design study by Ionescu-Lupeanu Design & Engineering. Not a built project. This concept explores how the studio's architecture and engineering would approach a cliffside resort in the Greek Islands. No site is contracted, no client is named, and no part of this study has been built.

Masterplan.

§02 — masterplan

The site is read as a section before it is read as a plan.

A boutique resort on an Aegean cliff is, first, a problem of slope: how much to remove, how much to hold, how much to let the rock stay itself. The masterplan answers by terracing. A single pedestrian spine descends the contour in measured steps; guest volumes hang off it to either side, each on its own terrace, each turned to the water rather than to its neighbour.

Arrival is at the top, where vehicles stop and the sea is withheld. The descent is the experience. Roughly thirty keys are distributed across seven terraces, thinning as the slope steepens, so density falls as the view widens. Shared program — reception, a small taverna, a spa and a single lap of pool at the water's edge — is spaced along the spine at the points where the terrain naturally levels. Nothing crowns the ridge. The tallest built element sits below the natural skyline, so the resort is quiet from the sea and quiet from the village above.

The plan is disciplined about what it leaves alone. Existing dry-stone field walls are surveyed and kept where they can be kept; new retaining walls continue their line and their material. Between the volumes, the slope is planted back — not landscaped into a garden, but returned to the low, mineral scrub the island already carries.

Architecture.

§03 — architecture

A small vocabulary used consistently.

White rendered volumes, thick-walled and deep-set, sit on plinths of local stone. The render is warm rather than blue-white; the stone is left rough where it retains and dressed only where it is touched. The two materials divide the labour: stone holds the ground, white volume holds the room.

Each guest volume is a simple prism with one considered opening. Windows are framed views, not glass walls — proportioned to hold the horizon at eye level from the bed, deep enough that the reveal shades the interior through the middle of the day. Where a terrace allows, the room extends into a courtyard: a walled outdoor room, part shade under a timber pergola, part open to the sky, private from the terrace above by the geometry of the section rather than by screens.

Circulation is external and generous. The spine is a sequence of stairs, landings and framed apertures — a walk that reveals the sea in fragments and withholds it until the lowest terrace. Colour is rationed to the materials themselves: white, stone, the grey of weathered timber, the single teal of shaded water. Light does the rest. In the Aegean it arrives hard and low; the building is detailed to catch it on a wall, throw it into a courtyard, and give the interior the calm, mineral shade the climate rewards.

Structural strategy.

§04 — structure

A retaining problem before it is a building problem — and it is engineered in that order.

The slope is stabilised by a stepped system of reinforced-concrete retaining walls, cast against the excavated face and tied back where the geotechnical profile requires it. Each terrace is a structural bench: a retaining wall to the uphill side, a slab that spans between wall and the downhill edge, and a foundation that steps with the rock rather than fighting it.

Above the retaining line, the guest volumes are light. A stepped structural grid follows the terracing, so loads travel down through short, stacked bays instead of long transfers — the section works with gravity, not against it. Reinforced concrete does the heavy, ground-engaged work; lighter framing and prefabricated elements are considered for the volumes above, to reduce crane reach on a constrained cliff site and to shorten the wet trades in a marine environment.

Detailing is corrosion-aware throughout. Salt air and intermittent water are treated as design loads: cover, mix design, drainage and material selection are set for an exposed coastal condition, not a mainland one. Seismic and wind actions are carried by the retaining and terrace structure acting together, checked to the governing local code. The studio's own steel-and-Tekla experience on long-span industrial buildings informs the lighter, buildable framing above; its public-building work informs the rigour expected below ground.

Note — local sign-offStructural sign-off, geotechnical investigation and code compliance for any real site would be carried out with local licensed engineers and structural checkers.

MEP & sustainability strategy.

§05 — mep

Water is the discipline of this concept.

A cliff resort makes its own rain problem and its own supply problem, and the two are solved together. Surface water is intercepted at every terrace, drained behind the retaining walls, and carried down a managed path rather than allowed to find its own — a slope this steep is only stable if the water is understood. Fresh water is planned around desalination coordination and storage sized to the season, with grey-water reuse for irrigation of the replanted scrub.

Servicing runs in the spine. MEP is coordinated into the stepped section so that risers and horizontal runs follow the circulation, keeping the guest volumes clean and the terraces free of visible plant. Wastewater is treated on site; STP and desalination plant are coordinated early, sized and located below the arrival level where they can be maintained without crossing guest routes. Cooling leans first on the building: thermal mass, deep reveals, cross-ventilation through the courtyards and shaded pergolas, so mechanical cooling is a supplement, not the strategy. Photovoltaic capacity is studied on the least-visible roofs and the arrival structure.

Note — local consultantsSTP and desalination sizing, environmental impact assessment and utilities approvals for any real site would be developed with local MEP/utilities consultants, EIA consultants and coastal/marine specialists.

BIM & technical documentation.

§06 — bim

The concept is built to be coordinated.

From the outset it is modelled in a single federated BIM environment — architecture, structure and MEP in one coordinate system, exchanged as IFC — because a stepped, retaining-led building is exactly where clash detection earns its cost. The retaining walls, the terrace slabs and the services in the spine are resolved against each other in the model long before they are resolved on site.

The structural model carries through to Tekla for the framed and prefabricated elements, so what is detailed is what is fabricated. Documentation is construction-oriented: setting-out driven by the model, terrace-by-terrace, so a constrained cliff site can be sequenced from the top down with the retaining works leading and the volumes following. For an international project the model is the shared language — the artefact that lets a Romanian design team and local consultants work to one geometry across a distance.

§ — honesty
A self-initiated design study. Not a built project.

For international projects — including the Maldives, Greece and other jurisdictions — local approvals, statutory submissions, code compliance and professional sign-off are handled together with local licensed architects, engineers, structural checkers, EIA consultants, coastal/marine specialists, fire consultants and MEP/utilities consultants. The studio is a technical partner; it does not replace local consultants.

Continue.

§07 — index
§ — start

Start a resort project